31 Aug Reducing brightness to make a better paper
Madison, Wis. — Researchers at the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) have joined with other federal agencies and the pulp and paper industry in an effort to reduce the economic costs and environmental impacts of the paper commonly used in business and government offices — while simultaneously improving the paper’s quality.
The federal government annually buys some 500,000 tons of bleached kraft paper, which includes the “plain white paper” used in computer printers, copiers, and fax machines. It’s the equivalent of using 11 million standard sheets of paper per hour, every hour of the year. (Even so, the federal government accounts for less than 2 percent of the bleached kraft paper produced in North America each year.)
Working with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, the FPL researchers initially will work to redefine paper “quality,” that is, to determine what performance criteria for paper are most important. The effort to examine government paper standards and specifications based on performance is mandated by an executive order.
“One way to improve some paper performance characteristics while simultaneously reducing cost is to reduce the amount of bleaching,” said Carl Houtman, a chemical engineer in the FPL’s paper-research unit. “Reducing bleaching would conserve energy, wood pulp, water and chemicals. The resulting paper will likely be stronger and more durable and possess other characteristics that better meet the government’s needs.”
Not surprisingly, however, limiting bleaching would also reduce the paper’s “brightness.” Brightness is defined by the International Standards Organization (ISO) as the percentage of blue light at a particular wavelength (457 nanometers) that is reflected by the paper’s surface.
Brightness is normally expressed as a percentage, with standard office printing papers being in the range from 82 to 95. A brightness index of 90 or above is commonly associated with “high quality” papers. Some manufacturers add fluorescent compounds to the paper’s surface to increase brightness — even above 100 percent. At least one major store chain advertises paper with a brightness index of 113.
Because pulp must be bleached at least five points higher than the final paper brightness to compensate for a phenomenon called brightness reversion, paper with an 84 brightness index — like much of that used by government agencies — requires bleaching to a brightness of 89.
The researchers are challenging the assumption that high brightness is important for most applications.
“Depending on how the paper is being used, high brightness might be undesirable,” Houtman says. “For example, it might create glare that could interfere with readability. And the amount of bleaching needed to achieve a high brightness will have a negative impact on qualities such as durability or printability.”
Achieving high brightness ratings requires more energy, more chemicals and more wood pulp. A shorter process could reduce energy consumption by a third and similarly reduce handling and consumption of chemicals used in bleaching, such as hydrogen peroxide, chlorine dioxide and alkali. Water-treatment costs would be reduced as well. Pulp yield could be increased as much as 1 percent, resulting in an annual savings of some 500,000 tons of green wood.
Preliminary studies indicate that bleaching to only 80 or so brightness could reduce the cost of paper by $34 a ton, saving the federal government $17 million a year. A typical pulp plant processing 1,000 tons per day would save more than $11 million per year, and there are some 70 such plants in the United States.
Eventually, the big savings — economically and environmentally — will come when less-bright paper becomes more widely accepted beyond the federal government, the FPL says. In North America , some 40 million tons of bleached kraft paper are produced each year, and 98 percent of that paper is used by businesses, state and local governments and consumers.