Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact email@example.com.
The economics of starting up have changed dramatically. Today, a plethora of Web services, open-source platforms, and open affiliate and advertising partners can lower the cost of creating a Web-centric business and leverage others' efforts to take that business to market.
These economics have spawned thousands of new companies around the globe, and turned up the volume in the innovation ecosystem to deafening levels. Keeping track and pace with these new companies is a full-time job, one taken on by dozens of bloggers who have set up shop to act as "early warning systems" for each new wave of so-called Web 2.0 companies.
You see, the economics of media have also changed, and dramatically. Now, anyone with a bit of time and minimal technical patience can opine endlessly about the technology market - or any other topic, for that matter.
Like many of you, I follow the technology blogs. Some of them are quite good. Others are link factories that crank up the noise but deliver little additive value. Never was this clearer than during the 48-hour Google
rumor-fest prior to the official announcement of the acquisition. One wonders how blogosphere rumor-mongering accelerated negotiations and drove the announcement timelines.
In the moments after the Wall Street Journal
published its story on the rumored acquisition, hundreds of bloggers posted their own knock-off stories, most of them referencing the Journal
, and nearly all linking to some other blogger that wrote more or less the same post: Google is buying YouTube for a boatload of money. It is a (good/bad) deal for (Google/YouTube).
In effect, the tech blogosphere became so obviously an inter-referential echo chamber. If markets are conversations, as the Clue Train Manifesto
suggests, the blogs that enable that conversation were adding very little to this particular conversation.
In that moment, I became sadly aware that the tech/Web 2.0 blogosphere has become an echo-sphere, inflating a bubble around itself, a bubble that most certainly cannot be sustained because, ultimately, the economics of time value can't support so many voices saying so much of the same thing.
Ultimately, though, this may be the best barometer of market correction. Unlike past market deflation, where print media setbacks trailed the fall of the companies that supported them, traffic metrics on popular blogs may precede any correction of expectation and the market consolidation that most folks believe lies in our near future.
A word to the wise, then - keep your eye on Alexa
ratings. They may just be the best leading indicator of the Web 2.0 market direction.Recent articles by Chris Shipley
Chris Shipley: Dancing with elephants requires nifty footwork
Chris Shipley: Sometimes, features can make a company
Chris Shipley: Is Beta the new Vapor?
Chris Shipley: What makes Silicon Valley so different?
Chris Shipley: Treo 700w solves my smart phone woes
Chris Shipley is the executive producer of NetworkWorld's DEMO Conferences, Editor of DEMO Letter, and a technology industry analyst for nearly 20 years. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
. Shipley, has covered the personal technology business since 1984, and is regarded as one of the top analysts covering the technology industry today.
Shipley has worked as a writer and editor for variety of technology consumer magazines, including PC Week, PC Magazine, PC/Computing, and InfoWorld, US Magazine, and Working Woman. She has written two books on communications and Internet technology, has won numerous awards for journalistic excellence, and was named the No. 1 newsletter editor by Marketing Computers for two years in a row. To subscribe to DEMOletter please visit: http://www.idgexecforums.com/demoletter/index.html
This column was reprinted with permission of Network World Inc. All registered trademarks are owned by IDG. More information can be found at http://www.idgef.com
The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC (WTN). WTN, LLC accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.