Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Green doesn’t up the ante on markup law

Green Bay, Wis. - The candidates for Wisconsin governor are playing a game of one- upsmanship on pocketbook issues, and it was U.S. Rep. Mark Green's turn to up the ante after Gov. Jim Doyle announced he would suspend enforcement of the state's minimum markup law for ethanol.

Green, however, did not take that opportunity to call for a comprehensive repeal of the minimum markup, even though he once voted for legislation to repeal the controversial law. Instead, he called on the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to stop investigating a Monroe gas station owner for selling an ethanol fuel blend, E-85, at just over $2 a gallon.

Green said state investigators should have better things to do than stopping gas station owners form selling cheaper fuel to motorists. "With the price of oil climbing higher and higher, we should be encouraging more use of alternative fuel, not trying to force the sale of ethanol at a huge markup," he said in a statement.

Mark my words

Green, who served in the Wisconsin Legislature before he was elected to Congress, has taken a cautious approach on minimum markup because recent studies indicate the law actually might be successful in holding down gas prices, according to campaign spokesman Luke Punzenberger.
Advertisement
"He feels it's something we need to take into account when we make future decisions on the issue," Punzenberger said.

The controversial law, enacted in the 1930s, establishes a minimum price at which gasoline and other motor fuels can be sold in Wisconsin. Advocates believe the law, which requires a 9.18 percent markeup from wholesalers to retailers, prevents large oil companies from undercutting independently owned service stations, and then racheting up the price after putting them out of business.

However, the law does not make a distinction between fuel derived from petroleum and fuel derived from ethanol, which in Doyle's view artificially drives up the price of ethanol blended fuels such as E-85 and E-10.

In response, Doyle announced that ethanol-based fuel would not be subject to the minimum markup law enforcement, and he directed the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to not take action against the sellers of ethanol-blended fuel.

The governor said his decision would add momentum to Wisconsin's status as an emerging leader in ethanol and other renewable fuels.

Accounting for the federal ethanol tax credit, ethanol is selling wholesale at $1.37 per gallon, while the price of petroleum is about $2.60 (not including taxes), according to Doyle.

"More and more drivers are turning to ethanol-based fuels because they are cheaper, and that is a trend we want to continue," Doyle said.

Applying even more heat to the GOP, the governor called on the Republican-controlled Joint Finance Committee to reconsider his plan to double the number of E-85 stations in Wisconsin, from 35 to 70. In June of this year, the committee rejected a Doyle proposal to provide $335,000 to increase the number of E-85 fueling stations.

The most recent game of one-upsmanship began when Green said Wisconsin should join other states and call a tax holiday for back-to-school expenses.

Related stories

Last ethanol article you'll ever need to read, Part II

John Biondi: Anti-ethanol arguments are easily debunked

Tom Still: The science is clear: Ethanol yields a net increase in energy

Joint Finance blocks Doyle ethanol measure

Tom Still: Wisconsin's promising bio-refining future won't run on ethanol alone

Comments

Gary Dikkers responded 8 years ago: #1

<< In June of this year, the committee rejected a Doyle proposal to provide $335,000 to increase the number of E-85 fueling stations. >>

And well they should have. It would be a poor investment of taxpayer dollars to build E85 infrastructure.

The reason is that even if we used the entire country's corn harvest and turned it into ethanol, we would still have less than 10% of our country's annual fuel consumption. We wouldn't have enough ethanol to turn all the gasoline we use into E10, let alone E85.

If we invested taxpayer money giving every filling station in the country E-85 infrastructure, most of that infrastructure would sit unused because we wouldn't have enough ethanol.

A better play would be to work towards universal acceptance of E10, and even then we wouldn't have enough ethanol to do that.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and are not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

WTN Media Presents