Advertisement
*
Reproduction permitted for personal use only. For reprints and reprint permission, contact reprints@wistechnology.com.

Structural change is coming to the UW System

More than a generation ago, a mega-merger of higher education institutions created the University of Wisconsin System. It hasn’t always been a perfect marriage, insist those who pine for days gone by, but the 1971 merger forced greater cooperation and prompted wiser use of Wisconsin’s public resources.

The time has come for the UW System to once again refine its structure, this time with 21st century realities in mind. Facing a state budget crunch, rising tuition costs and changing workforce development demands, the UW System won’t be able to stand pat for long. Its leaders know that. The only question is what form the “new” UW System will take.
 
One idea has come from state Rep. Rob Kreibich, R-Eau Claire, the chairman of the Assembly Higher Education Committee. He has proposed merging the 13 two-year campuses with the 13 four-year campuses, essentially pairing them to increase regional cooperation while cutting administrative overhead. Other legislators, Democrat and Republican, have said Kreibich’s idea may be worth a look. System administrators also said they’re happy to consider all ideas to boost efficiency, and they’re already working on their own comprehensive plan.
 
It’s not clear whether Kreibich’s plan would actually save that much money (even a “satellite” campus needs someone to run things), but it has sparked a debate about how the UW System should be organized for the future.
 
Consider the UW-Milwaukee and the two-year centers within a short drive of its campus on the city’s northeast side. The UW-Milwaukee would be hard-pressed to expand on its existing campus, but could offer more four-year courses at UW-Waukesha or UW-Washington County. The benefits to the regional economy should be obvious, especially in research ectors where the UW-Milwaukee is poised to work with Wisconsin’s private business clusters.

In Waukesha County, for example, the technical college campus has been a leader in working with Wisconsin’s printing industry. Wouldn’t the power of a four-year doctoral campus in the neighborhood help that effort?

The two-year campuses offer access to higher education for students who might otherwise not attend, so any plan to merge them into the four-year campuses needs closer inspection. At the same time, critics have long wondered why Wisconsin needs 13 two-year UW campuses and 16 two-year technical college districts – especially when the technical college districts are, by mission, closely aligned with meeting the workforce needs of Wisconsin employers.
 
If the two-year campuses can serve a dual function – access for students on their way up, and satellites for larger campuses with specific economic expertise – questions about usefulness might disappear.
 
UW System President Kevin Reilly appears to already be thinking along those lines. Reilly, a former chancellor of the UW Extension, has talked about combining the administration of the 13 two-year campuses with UW Extension. That’s essentially how it was done before the 1971 UW System merger, with combined the University of Wisconsin (with four major campuses at Madison, Milwaukee, Green Bay and Parkside, along with University Extension) with the 11 state universities.
 
Industry leaders such as John Torinus, chief executive officer of West Bend’s Serigraph Co., have long advocated closer ties between the UW System and the state’s 11 recognized business “clusters,” which include printing, papermaking, tourism, agriculture, biotechnology, forest products and more. Growth of the clusters could be stimulated by a refined UW System structure.

Reilly, the UW Board of Regents and other UW leaders will embrace change. In fact, they may lead the charge to demonstrate to Governor Jim Doyle and the Legislature that the UW System is in tune with the times. Whether that change includes a merger of the two-year and four-year campuses or other ideas, the UW System will adapt. It always has.

Tom Still is president of the Wisconsin Technology Council and the Wisconsin Innovation Network. He is the former associate editor of the Wisconsin State Journal in Madison.

The opinions expressed herein or statements made in the above column are solely those of the author, & do not necessarily reflect the views of Wisconsin Technology Network, LLC. (WTN). WTN, LLC accepts no legal liability or responsibility for any claims made or opinions expressed herein.

Comments

Andy Wojdula responded 9 years ago: #1

When looking at economies someone in the 'System' should be looking at the rising costs of the "MATC's" in the state and how they figure into the overall education goals!

John K. Enger responded 9 years ago: #2

Hi!
Thought-provoking piece. Just wondered if you know that the two-printing program is already tied to Stout in that graduates of the program can go on for a bachelor's degree from us while continuing to live down there. We
may have already discussed this but I wanted to be sure. Please let me know if you need more info. John E.

Jim Perry responded 9 years ago: #3

Rep. Kreibich’s proposal “nucleate” the two-year UW campuses with four-year universities is a terrible idea.

Kreibich “2005 idea” was abandoned in 1972. It did not work then; it won’t work now. It won’t save money. It won’t further Wisconsin’s educational needs.

From 1969-72 UW-Fox Valley was tied to Green Bay. Educational materials and equipment were diverted to Green Bay. Our students were treated as second class citizens. Recognizing that student and community interests were harmed, the State undid the “satellite” concept and consolidated the two-year campuses as one institution.

Major cost savings by cutting janitors and student support staff and advisors? “Heck, we can run a bus load of janitors from Oshkosh up the road every couple of weeks. No need to clean the poor folks place that often anyway. Student Services and advising? Let ‘em get it online.” Or not. All these functions existed on the “satellite” campuses. The projected cost savings are phantom.

Let's compare UW Colleges with UW Oshkosh becasue they are about the same size as an institution.

The 12,000-student 13 Colleges campuses 2003 operating budget was $78.9 million; UWO’s was $131.4 million. We had 9.4 students per employee; 7.1 for UWO. Our instructional cost in 2004-05 is $7002 per student; UWO’s is $7614. At UWO’s costs taxpayers pay $7,344,000 more to educate our 12,000 students (12,000 x $612 = $7,344,000).

There are good reasons why UWO has higher instructional costs. But if anyone is concerned about costs and efficiency they should advocate that freshmen and sophomores attend the UW Colleges instead of any 4 year campuses.

Battles waged about higher education in the UW System shouldn’t be about turf, they should be about dollars and sense (pun intended). Only then will taxpayers win.

-Add Your Comment

Name:
E-mail:

Comment Policy: WTN News accepts comments that are on-topic and do not contain advertisements, profanity or personal attacks. Comments represent the views of the individuals who post them and do not necessarily represent the views of WTN Media or our partners, advertisers, or sources. Comments are moderated and are not immediately posted. Your email address will not be posted.

WTN Media cannot accept liability for the content of comments posted here or verify their accuracy. If you believe this comment section is being abused, contact edit@wistechnology.com.

WTN Media Presents